RE: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
Jeffrey> Could this be TCP slot tables? Flow control capabilities on Jeffrey> ONTAP continue to improve. If you don't have TCP slot tables Jeffrey> ca
View ArticleRE: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
Well as is always the way with these random issues it is the simplest thing to fix the problem. After a test to mount the storage on one of the SLES s
View ArticleRE: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
Mark> Well as is always the way with these random issues it is the Mark> simplest thing to fix the problem. After a test to mount the Mark> storage on
View ArticleRe: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:44:00AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote: > > That's good to hear! The takeaway I have from this is that NFS over > UDP is not so
View ArticleRe: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter D Gray <pdg@uow.edu.au> writes: Peter> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:44:00AM -0500, John Stoffel wrote: >> >> That's good to hea
View ArticleRe: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
On 30 Jan 2018, at 7:57 am, John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org<mailto:john@stoffel.org>> wrote: They used UDP at the time because computers and network
View ArticleRE: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
I will try to find the kernel bug number as I cant see it in the documentation for the server there is just the following note. RHEL 5.11 has a b
View ArticleRE: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
If that's 441463, I'm skeptical that's the problem. That might cause problems during boot, but I wouldnât expect it to cause problems later. Also, a
View ArticleRE: NFS issue after upgrading filers to 9.2P2
After a bit of an email search it was this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321111 From: Steiner, Jeffrey [mailto:Jeffrey.Stein
View ArticleRe: its been a month I have not seen any posting, hope my subscription is...
we're still here... just no one is asking. _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.tea
View ArticleRe: its been a month I have not seen any posting, hope my subscription is...
Yes Sent from my iPhone > On 2 Mar 2018, at 19:05, John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org> wrote: > > > we're still here... just no one is asking. > > _
View ArticleRe: its been a month I have not seen any posting, hope my subscription is...
__ ?On 02/03/2018, 22:10, "toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of John Stoffel" <toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of john@stoffel.org> w
View ArticleNetApp at SCaLE in Pasadena
The Southern California Linux Expo is a an annual four-day open source conference that starts this Thursday, 3/8. The expo hall will be open Friday 2
View ArticleRe: Netapp-_NFS_datastore_VMware__SQL VM__NTFS
May want to read the best practices TR below. Page 20 Create LUNs with SnapDrive for Windows or SnapCenter whenever possible. If you want to cre
View ArticleRe: Netapp-_NFS_datastore_VMware__SQL VM__NTFS
Steve,Thank you! I have seen the doc as well. My question is how this is applicable to NFS based VMsThere is not lun here. The vmware datastore is on
View Articleglobal snapmirror throttle wastes another 2 days
Some time back I wasted 5 days trying to find out why my snapmirrors were not keeping up. Netapp eventually very kindly told me about the global snapm
View ArticleRe: Netapp-_NFS_datastore_VMware__SQL VM__NTFS
I didnât really find anything. I looked at the VMWare SQL best practices, and there is little to no reference for NFS, but there is some for VMFS.
View ArticleRE: global snapmirror throttle wastes another 2 days
Can you give us details of commands you ran to check, change and confirm this? -----Original Message----- From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto
View ArticleRe: global snapmirror throttle wastes another 2 days
The original thread had the subject 'Super Secret Flags' and was active in late Jan / early Feb 2017. It was an interesting thread and worth reading.
View Article