AW: Failed disks...
I'd suggest to destroy aggregate B (without data) and zero the spares so if something happens with another productive disk you have a spare again. If
View ArticleRe: why flexpod use cluster os?
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Iluhes <iluhes@yahoo.com> wrote: > > if it is a 2 node cluster. Why use cluster os? Because 7-mode is deprecated....
View ArticleRE: why flexpod use cluster os?
Two particular benefits that apply to almost any workload, even on a 2-node configuration, are (a) the ability to nondisruptively move volumes between
View ArticleRe: why flexpod use cluster os?
On top of that cDOT also allows you to throttle workloads using the built-in QoS functionality by specifying either a max throughput value (MB/s or IO
View ArticleEverything in a qtree?
Hi, Back about 7 years ago when we purchased our first NetApp systems we hired a NetApp consultant to help us set them up. One of the things he told
View ArticleRe: Everything in a qtree?
For my customers....I called that: TMAC's rule #1 ;) Always use qtrees. Always. In 7-mode, it really did not hurt and when migrations came up, it wa
View ArticleRE: Everything in a qtree?
I'd second that...and obviously if you want any sort of user level quotas, or want to be able to mirror/move the data in the qtree. --rdp From: toas
View ArticleRE: Everything in a qtree?
In cDOT I would recommend against qtrees unless absolutely needed. As for needed, things like hitting volume limits come to mind. Why? Because you c
View ArticleRe: Everything in a qtree?
for cDOT...I fully agree for 7-mode, most people (at least those I knew) rarely, if ever used vol copy. You can still migrate the qtree (qtree snapmi
View ArticleRe: Everything in a qtree?
One of the main advantages of a qtree is the ability to use move style commands, but there's a default qtree for each volume that allows that to happe
View ArticleAW: Everything in a qtree?
I personally was a heavy qtree user back in the 7-mode times and when I set up my first cDOT gear I was looking desperately to replicate what I got on
View ArticleIOPS Planning for the Deswizzle Process?
Hello Toasters, We've unfortunately had to reduce the frequency of our volume snapmirror updates in order to allow for our destination aggregate to d
View ArticleCDOT domain joining with a prestaged account?
Installing my first CDOT machine, and when we got to the point of joining the first CIFS SVM to the domain, we hit a snag. It looks like ontap expects
View ArticleRe: CDOT domain joining with a prestaged account?
It should ask you if you want to re-use the account. From: Basil <basilberntsen@gmail.com<mailto:basilberntsen@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, January
View ArticleRe: CDOT domain joining with a prestaged account?
Ok, I'll check the credentials, then. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Parisi, Justin <Justin.Parisi@netapp.com> wrote: > It should ask you if you
View Articletool to generate cifs I/O load
I'm looking for a tool to generate a load onto a CIFS share from a Windows server. I see lots of comments out on the internet with folks using IOMETE
View ArticleRE: tool to generate cifs I/O load
I believe sio will run against a share (or at least on a mapped drive): http://mysupport.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/sio_ntap/ mark From: toa
View ArticleRE: tool to generate cifs I/O load
Quick and dirty â' To simply create a LARGE file as fast as a client can; look at the linux command âDDâ. There are a few free/shareware wind
View ArticleRe: tool to generate cifs I/O load
Hi Rick, This is neto from Brazil How are you? Iometer 2006 version works with CIFS. All the best neto NetApp - I love this company! From: <Rhod
View ArticleRe: tool to generate cifs I/O load
Hi, I've used iometer in the past. A similar tool is vdbench. Isaac On 29/01/15 15:44, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote: > Hi Rick, > > This is
View Article