Re: cDOT Transition Mirror
Just one thing. Your 32 bit aggregates aren't supported in 8.3, so you will need to TDP to 8.2 CDOT first, then upgrade to 8.3. The latest version o
View ArticleRe: CDOT failover groups in 8.2.1P6
Have you all had a chance to review TR-4182? http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4182.pdf - Broadcast domains are covered on page 13 - Failover group
View ArticleRE: CDOT failover groups in 8.2.1P6
It does not really explain what happens during upgrade from 8.2 to 8.3. It could be inferred that previous policies from 8.2 will remain in effect bas
View ArticleRe: CDOT failover groups in 8.2.1P6
Thanks for the feedback. I¹ll ping the author to get clarification and report back. :) On 5/29/15, 11:05 AM, "Borzenkov, Andrei" <andrei.borzenkov@ts
View ArticleRE: CDOT failover groups in 8.2.1P6
After upgrade, all existing 8.2 failover groups are retained and broadcast-domain is created of the same name. So to rename you have to rename the br
View ArticleRE: CDOT failover groups in 8.2.1P6
What is unclear to me - failover groups can be overlapping (if my memory serves me right, I can add port to multiple failover groups) and broadcast do
View Articleneed some reallocate advice
Hi, A bunch of IBM NSeries 3220 (NetApp FAS2240-2) OnTap 8.1.2p1 I'm about to start adding 2 disks to a bunch of NetApp systems - 2 disks into each
View ArticleRe: need some reallocate advice
Richard L. Rhodes wrote: > A bunch of IBM NSeries 3220 (NetApp FAS2240-2) > > OnTap 8.1.2p1 Ok so I'm pretty sure this version has wallocV2 algorith
View ArticleDedicated ONTAP disks?
Iâm curious how many admins dedicate 3 disks for ONTAP aggr0/vol0 vs having one big aggr0 and vol0 residing on the same aggr as the other data volum
View ArticleRE: Dedicated ONTAP disks? (Fletcher Cocquyt)
The latest install was configured with dedicated aggregates just for vol0 (NetApp Best Practice - especially for CDOT systems). If you have an issue
View ArticleRe: Dedicated ONTAP disks?
Yes, there are some good reasons to have a dedicated root aggr even on older 7-mode systems. For example, if you ever have to run wafliron on a reall
View ArticleRE: Dedicated ONTAP disks?
We have dedicated root aggregates for machines that are customer facing, but we will use aggr0 for data on snapvault secondary and archive only machin
View ArticleRe: Dedicated ONTAP disks?
Le 5 juin 2015 22:44:14 GMT+02:00, Fletcher Cocquyt <fcocquyt@stanford.edu> a écrit : >Iâm curious how many admins dedicate 3 disks for ONTAP aggr0
View ArticleRe: Dedicated ONTAP disks?
Hi, Additionally, having the node root volumes on dedicated aggregates allows you to perform non-disruptive controller upgrades (headswaps) in cDOT u
View Articlecheck Global Status of a CDOT cluster using SNMP?
Hello All, We're rolling out a pair of CDOT clusters and setting up Nagios monitoring. On our pre-CDOT clusters we check the global health of the fi
View Articlecluster OS vs 7-mode
For years I been complaining how much I dont like Cluster OS over 7-mode.I been telling netapp folks to keep 7 mode as an option and parallel OSThe st
View ArticleRe: cluster OS vs 7-mode
True, 7-mode/cDOT transition is a hurdle for all the obvious reasons, though customers who are fortunate enough to work with VARs that have swing gear
View ArticleRe: cluster OS vs 7-mode
In my mind, CDOT has lots of promise on paper, but where it falls flat against 7-mode is maturity. The maturity of a platform is hard to quantify, but
View ArticleRe: cluster OS vs 7-mode
Parallel OS is a niche market that doesn't fit in all scenarios. Transition is a work in progress that will keep getting better. 8.3 cDOT closed man
View ArticleRe: cluster OS vs 7-mode
I don't know, but as someone who's been working with 7-mode since 2006, I love cluster mode. Specifically, 8.3. SVMs, migrating volumes hot between
View Article