Quantcast
Browsing all 2909 articles
Browse latest View live

Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

This weekend I did head swap from FAS3140 to FAS8040 in 7-Mode FMC. Storage is DS14mk4 and one DS2246 that was added later. Backend switches are Broca

View Article


Re: Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

What FC ports are you using on the FAS8040 (onboard/PCIe Card)? how about the sysconfig -a for the FC ports involved (not the whole thing!)? Do you ha

View Article


Re: Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

Have you checked the fillword settings for the ports? 8gb with fillword mode 0 can cause issues. On Monday, 3 October 2016, andrei.borzenkov@ts.fujit

View Article

RE: Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

What FC ports are you using on the FAS8040 (onboard/PCIe Card)? [Borzenkov, Andrei] onboard how about the sysconfig -a for the FC ports involved (

View Article

RE: Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

Wrong fillword matters for connection of 4G hosts to 8G switch ports. 8G host with 8G switch should be OK (they are running with the same defaults). A

View Article


Re: Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

You would not believe the silly stuff I have seen customers do.   Get Outlook for iOS On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:40 AM -0400, "andrei.borzenkov@ts

View Article

RE: Frame discards on Brocade with 7-Mode FMC using 8G HBA and DS14

Hi, Yes, UTA2 do not support direct connection of DS14 because they do not support FC-AL. They are supported in FMC though for connection to backen

View Article

IOM3 and IOM6 on same loop

Hello, I currently have 3 DS4243's with IOM3 connected to my 8020 HA pair. I also have DS2246 with IOM6 as the last shelf on the loop. I want to ad

View Article


Re: IOM3 and IOM6 on same loop

No problem. The DS4243s can also be upgraded to a DS4246 by replacing the IOM modules, if you want to avoid the 3/6 transition issues at some point.

View Article


Re: IOM3 and IOM6 on same loop

Hi Kim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Francis Kim <fkim@berkcom.com> wrote: > No problem. The DS4243s can also be upgraded to a DS4246 by replac

View Article

Re: IOM3 and IOM6 on same loop

I’ve tried this in the past with the same result as you got. I thought I ran across a NetApp document last week that said you can upgrade the DS424

View Article

RE: IOM3 and IOM6 on same loop

AFAIK even if you replace the IOM3 with an IOM6 the SAS expander in the 4243 would still run at 3GB/s so it would be mostly pointless to do it. Ant

View Article

RE: IOM3 and IOM6 on same loop

While technically possible it is not supported to replace the IOM3 modules with the IOM6 modules in a DS4243. Also, because you have a mix stack of th

View Article


SnapMirror policy clarification

Hello I'm trying to understand the differences between the snapshot policies included in cDOT 8.3, namely DPDefault and MirrorAllSnapshots. The docum

View Article

Re: SnapMirror policy clarification

I've not messed around with these, but they are system created policies. All policies, theoretically even system-created ones, should be able to be se

View Article


RE: SnapMirror policy clarification

DPDefault is legacy for traditional (volume based, DP) SnapMirror while MirrorAllSnapshots is for new version-flexible (XDP) SnapMirror. DPDefault wor

View Article

Re: SnapMirror policy clarification

Andrei Thank you for the explanation, that behavior makes sense. This can be marked as [SOLVED] :) Ian Ehrenwald Senior Infrastructure Engineer Hac

View Article


Culprit...

I've got an aggregate on a FAS2554c, running ONTAP 9, that runs at over 4500 read IOPS constantly. All of the volumes in the aggregate don't generate

View Article

Re: Culprit...

Try 'priv set -q diag; wafl scan status'. You may find it's a deswizzle operation if it's a snap mirror destination. On 18 October 2016 at 20:13, Car

View Article

Re: Culprit...

[cid:image001.png@01D229F4.80C244E0] [cid:image002.png@01D229F4.80C244E0] does seem to be running away with the box. Was this box upgraded from

View Article
Browsing all 2909 articles
Browse latest View live