Re: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
I do not have the solution, but I did run into a problem several years ago when we migrated a windows file share to the a netapp running 8.1 or 8.2. I
View ArticleRe: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
Any performance difference between mapping shares this way: cifs://server/share (forces smb 1) Vs. smb://server/share (smb 2+) ? Sent from my iPh
View ArticleRe: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
On 08/11/16 10:16, Christopher S Eno wrote: > Any performance difference between mapping shares this way: > > cifs://server/share (forces smb 1) > >
View ArticleRe: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
From NetApp (RE: 8.3 but might still apply). Other things I've done, disable SMB 3 on the NetApp and/or hide the snapshot directory on the share bein
View ArticleRe: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
Also, this page might help (kind of old) http://www.sysadminfaq.com/2014/06/mac-os-x-mavericks-finder-slow.html > On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:00 PM, S En
View ArticleRe: Troubleshooting 'unreachable' on a CDOT port
Thank you for the replies - we've got to a point where we _think_ we're "just" tickling a known issue: *987243* In certain instances, the Ethernet in
View ArticleRe: Troubleshooting 'unreachable' on a CDOT port
You should be able to failover it to another port on the same node. ?????????? ? iPhone 8 ????. 2016 ?., ? 13:43, Edward Rolison <ed.rolison@gmail.c
View ArticleRe: ONTAP9 NFSv4 + CentOS 6.8 does not work
I'm not 100% sure what has happened, most likely in-house "server provisioning tool" failed in such a way that some NFS related packages were not inst
View ArticleRe: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
On 08/11/16 11:00, S Eno wrote: > > Perform the following steps to resolve the issue: > > 1. Add |nsmb.conf |to |~/Library/Preferences/| with the fol
View ArticleRe: Problems with SMB and macOS Sierra?
On 09/11/16 11:10, James Andrewartha wrote: > On 08/11/16 11:00, S Eno wrote: >> >> Perform the following steps to resolve the issue: >> >> 1. Add |n
View ArticleNFS V4 and nobody
I am mounting an export via NFS V4. At first, I saw that mounted clients showed user/group as nobody:nobody. But then I configured the nfs.v4.id.dom
View ArticleRE: NFS V4 and nobody
Use the NFS option nfs.v4.numeric.ids (or something similar⦠forget what it is exactly). From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bou
View ArticleRE: NFS V4 and nobody
nfs.v4.id.allow_numerics I think thatâs the one. --rdp From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf
View ArticleRe: NFS V4 and nobody
Toasters is awesome.... yes that is what I needed. Thanks ! On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Payne, Richard <richard.payne@amd.com> wrote: > nfs.
View ArticleFlash Cache vs Flash Pool
Hello Toasters I'm thinking about if/how to implement Flash Pool in our new cDOT clusters, and was wondering if anyone could provide a bit of real wor
View ArticleRE: Flash Cache vs Flash Pool
As you wrote, FlashCache will not be used by data residing on an SSD or FlashPool aggregate. ' In my experience, the difference between FlashCache an
View ArticleRe: Flash Cache vs Flash Pool
As I heard Flash Cache and Flash Pool work as hierarchal cache in ONTAP 9.1. New FAS systems have embedded Flash Cache and you cann't buy new system w
View ArticleRE: Flash Cache vs Flash Pool
Correct. We cover this in episode 62 of the Tech ONTAP podcast: https://soundcloud.com/techontap_podcast/episode-62-ontap-91-hardware-refresh
View ArticleFlash Cache older 3020c??
I saw a few threads talking about flash cache and it made me think of my old 3020c that continues to chug along in my lab running 7.3.7. (568 days) D
View ArticleRe: Flash Cache older 3020c??
FYI, here are the specs on that card. Adapter Search Results Mktg Part No Mfg Part No Description Category Bus Type Optical Module Supported Speed(s)
View Article