AW: AW: AW: AW: System attention LED
Hi, just as a follow up â' I upgraded the FAS2240 to 8.2.4P5 including all the SP firmware update etc. and the LED was still on; I also halted the
View ArticleRE: Flash Cache vs Flash Pool
Just to close this out - we took this offline for a little data collection. Here's an example of what you can learn about storage performance from Ora
View ArticleSOLVED: snapmirror source and target aggregate usage don't match?
Hello All, This provided an opportunity to find and implement some improvements in our dedupe/snapmirror configuration but that wasn't the real probl
View ArticleRe: SOLVED: snapmirror source and target aggregate usage don't match?
Interesting. I would have thought the destination would have been thin. Do u really need to run dedupe everyday? I used to run only 1x per week on my
View ArticleRe: Atomicity of rename on NFS
I'm pretty much on default options. (So will be caching attributes) So is this likely a question of attribute caching on the reading client? It's cac
View ArticleRE: Atomicity of rename on NFS
I would expect 'Stale NFS handle' if the problem was (another) client caching. But it looks like (another) client actually contacts server and gets 'N
View ArticleRE: Atomicity of rename on NFS
Now that I think about it, it is surprisingly rare. I've run into this from time to time, though. A file rename or a removal on one client will cause
View ArticleRe: Atomicity of rename on NFS
Just a comment: race conditions over NFS can be common and severe if you construct a piece of SW (a system) which inherently assumes perfect [client]
View ArticleAW: Atomicity of rename on NFS
Yah, that's a PITA sometimes. Anyways, customers usually tend to ignore these facts hence why we're sometimes providing a small additional NFS volume
View ArticleRe: Atomicity of rename on NFS
One more comment on caching in NFS. On 2016-12-29 12:06, I wrote: > Just a comment: race conditions over NFS can be common and severe if you > constr
View ArticleRe: Atomicity of rename on NFS
Agreed - NFS is problematic for all sorts of reasons when trying to use it as a parallel data store. It has worked to date, and the update to our NetA
View ArticleRe: AW: Atomicity of rename on NFS
What you describe below (about a special NFS mount) is not a bad idea IMO, but it still assumes the users understand what rendez-vous is (in a real
View ArticleAW: Atomicity of rename on NFS
Yah, thatâs all the ammunition you need here. Every operation performed on an NFS datastore is atomic, but only from a client point of view â' Cac
View ArticleAW: AW: Atomicity of rename on NFS
Yah, tell me about it - having this kind of discussions with every new customer on our platforms :) Best, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operati
View ArticleRe: Atomicity of rename on NFS
As a followup on this - I've tracked down the problem, and wanted to say thanks to all the people offering insight - most of it moved me in the right
View ArticleSnapvault including old Snapshots?
Hi, I'm not sure if this is possible with SnapVault, but I would need to snapvault an existing volume which does currently have old sv_daily Snapshot
View ArticleRE: Snapvault including old Snapshots?
Hi, SnapVault can do that, with a two-step process. First, create the SnapVault relationship with snapvault start -S primary:/vol/vol/qtree secondar
View ArticleRE: ONTAP9 SystemManager issues with quotas
fyi, defect has been found, waiting for fix, sk > -----Original Message----- > From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty
View ArticleOntap select with snaplock?
Does anyone whether Ontap Select supports snaplock? ************************************************************************* This message and any a
View ArticleAW: Snapvault including old Snapshots?
Thanks, I've started the update with this command now - at least I didn't get an error message for it, so let's see i fit will copy over all the data
View Article