Quantcast
Channel: Netapp | toasters
Viewing all 2909 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
Hi Jeremy, Thanks for the reply. Excuse my ignorance here but I looked at the disk statistics from statit and it I can't see how I can determine the

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
Statit will get you the AMALGAMATED workload to disks on writes, not individual IOs. There's nothing there. On reads..sure, I can see that. The un

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
I am not sure that's really true. ALL writes are going to be "sequential" if they can - the filer writes to NVRAM not disk directly. So the AFAIK the

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
:s/NVRAM/System Memory/g Fixed it for ya. :) On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Jeremy Page <jeremy.page@gilbarco.com>wrote: > I am not sure tha

RE: AW: Consistency Point Type M

$
0
0
Did you guys ever figure out what was causing these/correct this issue. I am seeing what sounds like the same thing on a 3240 , however.. When I

Re: AW: Consistency Point Type M

$
0
0
Does it need corrected? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 17, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Jordan Slingerland <Jordan.Slingerland@independenthealth.com> wrote: > >

AW: AW: Consistency Point Type M

$
0
0
Hi Jordan, no, since we talked with the customer and he said he was doing unusual workloads which he usually does not run on this system and it als

reallocate effect on snapmirror and snapvault

$
0
0
Hi, I'm thinking of running a "reallocate start -p" on a couple volumes that are showing high latency disk accesses for luns. The volume is a sour

Re: reallocate effect on snapmirror and snapvault

$
0
0
rrhodes@firstenergycorp.com wrote: > I'm thinking of running a 'reallocate start -p' on a couple volumes that > are showing high latency disk accesse

RE: 2240 hot add tray

$
0
0
Here is the link to the netapp support site doc for hot adding the shelves. https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1119629 Thank you

Re: 2240 hot add tray

$
0
0
You are going to disable one path. Hook it up. Re-enable the path. Disable the other Path. Hook up the second path. Re-enable the second path. If App

Re: 2240 hot add tray

$
0
0
thanks Will, for the direct link ! On Jan 20, 2014, at 2:38 PM, "William Atherton" <watherton@BERKCOM.com> wrote: > Here is the link to the netapp

RE: 2240 hot add tray

$
0
0
probably some overlap in info, but there is a sas and apc cabling guide as well. https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMM1280392 ____________

RE: 2240 hot add tray

$
0
0
The Netapp doc mentioned is pretty good. I also use the Netapp Config Advisor tool http://support.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/config_advisor/ y

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
Isn't NVRAM slower than system RAM? So in theory could cause a bottleneck (this may no longer be true but you don't also have to wait for a CP on syst

C-mode & ARP cache...

$
0
0
Does anyone know if a C-mode filer does a gratuitous ARP when it fails a port over? Got a VM issue I'm trying to resolve. Mark Flint mf1@sanger.ac.

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
"Isn't NVRAM slower than system RAM?" --- The access to/from/etc, sure. LIkely. Probly. "So in theory could cause a bottleneck" --- Not unless your

RE: C-mode & ARP cache...

$
0
0
Yes. We pretty much have to since all LIFs on a port use the same MAC address. Technically, we don't fail ports over - we fail over the logical inte

Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers

$
0
0
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Jeff Mohler <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> wrote: > ..which is why if you wanna go faster, blame the network team. :) :

flow control and 10g interfaces - ifgrps and vlans

$
0
0
Can flow control be disabled on a vlan interface? I tried in a simulator and It spits back "SIOCSFLOWCONTROL - Operation not supported by device" In
Viewing all 2909 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images