Hi Jeremy, Thanks for the reply. Excuse my ignorance here but I looked at the disk statistics from statit and it I can't see how I can determine the
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
↧
↧
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
Statit will get you the AMALGAMATED workload to disks on writes, not individual IOs. There's nothing there. On reads..sure, I can see that. The un
↧
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
I am not sure that's really true. ALL writes are going to be "sequential" if they can - the filer writes to NVRAM not disk directly. So the AFAIK the
↧
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
:s/NVRAM/System Memory/g Fixed it for ya. :) On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Jeremy Page <jeremy.page@gilbarco.com>wrote: > I am not sure tha
↧
RE: AW: Consistency Point Type M
Did you guys ever figure out what was causing these/correct this issue. I am seeing what sounds like the same thing on a 3240 , however.. When I
↧
↧
Re: AW: Consistency Point Type M
Does it need corrected? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 17, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Jordan Slingerland <Jordan.Slingerland@independenthealth.com> wrote: > >
↧
AW: AW: Consistency Point Type M
Hi Jordan, no, since we talked with the customer and he said he was doing unusual workloads which he usually does not run on this system and it als
↧
reallocate effect on snapmirror and snapvault
Hi, I'm thinking of running a "reallocate start -p" on a couple volumes that are showing high latency disk accesses for luns. The volume is a sour
↧
Re: reallocate effect on snapmirror and snapvault
rrhodes@firstenergycorp.com wrote: > I'm thinking of running a 'reallocate start -p' on a couple volumes that > are showing high latency disk accesse
↧
↧
RE: 2240 hot add tray
Here is the link to the netapp support site doc for hot adding the shelves. https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1119629 Thank you
↧
Re: 2240 hot add tray
You are going to disable one path. Hook it up. Re-enable the path. Disable the other Path. Hook up the second path. Re-enable the second path. If App
↧
Re: 2240 hot add tray
thanks Will, for the direct link ! On Jan 20, 2014, at 2:38 PM, "William Atherton" <watherton@BERKCOM.com> wrote: > Here is the link to the netapp
↧
RE: 2240 hot add tray
probably some overlap in info, but there is a sas and apc cabling guide as well. https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMM1280392 ____________
↧
↧
RE: 2240 hot add tray
The Netapp doc mentioned is pretty good. I also use the Netapp Config Advisor tool http://support.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/config_advisor/ y
↧
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
Isn't NVRAM slower than system RAM? So in theory could cause a bottleneck (this may no longer be true but you don't also have to wait for a CP on syst
↧
C-mode & ARP cache...
Does anyone know if a C-mode filer does a gratuitous ARP when it fails a port over? Got a VM issue I'm trying to resolve. Mark Flint mf1@sanger.ac.
↧
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
"Isn't NVRAM slower than system RAM?" --- The access to/from/etc, sure. LIkely. Probly. "So in theory could cause a bottleneck" --- Not unless your
↧
↧
RE: C-mode & ARP cache...
Yes. We pretty much have to since all LIFs on a port use the same MAC address. Technically, we don't fail ports over - we fail over the logical inte
↧
Re: Random/Sequential measurement on Filers
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Jeff Mohler <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> wrote: > ..which is why if you wanna go faster, blame the network team. :) :
↧
flow control and 10g interfaces - ifgrps and vlans
Can flow control be disabled on a vlan interface? I tried in a simulator and It spits back "SIOCSFLOWCONTROL - Operation not supported by device" In
↧
More Pages to Explore .....